Because we all know marriages are torn apart by farts

Really, whose hasn’t? Amirite??

And yes, this is for real. (Patent pending!)

Oh, how I fear for humanity.

(via Geekologie)

Short Film Friday: Validation

You’re great!

And so is this film….

Happy Friday!

A profane recipe site

Grant and I often have a hard time coming up with things to make for dinner (as I’ve gone on about before). We have our staples, but sometimes we want something different, and are both too easy-going to decide. What do we do in those circumstances? We turn to the internets.

But sometimes, even looking for a recipe online yields too many options, and we just end up shrugging at each other going, “I dunno, what do you want to make?”

Enter “What the Fuck Should I Make for Dinner.”

Here’s an example of what it looks like:

It’s so … angry! I feel like it’s yelling at me, and I was eager to click the first selection (which takes you to the recipe on another site) out of fear that it was going to be mad at me for saying “I don’t fucking like that.”

As you can see, it’s also vegetarian friendly, and I love the disconnect between the foul language and the extravagant sounding recipes.

(via TDW)

Awesome ice cube tray

Grant and I are no strangers to ice cube trays. He has one of those old fashioned metal ones where you pull back the lever to crack the ice into cubes, and we have several of those silicone ones that come in the shape of bottles, or Christmas trees, or whatever, and bend like Gumby.

The most common ice cube tray, of course, is the standard plastic version, where you twist to crack the cubes. I’ve always thought they were kind of a hassle. Ice cubes always ended up on the floor, or just not cracking perfectly.

Ice cube trays and how well they work doesn’t really affect our lives, I know, especially when it’s so easy to go and buy a bag of pre-made ice that doesn’t have any of that gross freezer burn smell. But some ingenious soul has come up with a better ice cube tray:

Awesome. Really, how has no one thought of this before?

Media censorship in an age of extremism

As you may have heard in the news lately, South Park has received a lot of attention for an episode in which they portray Muhammad in a bear suit. The episode was subsequently censored by Comedy Central, after a threat made by a group of Muslim extremists based in New York.

From the Guardian article:

The censorship followed a warning from a New York-based group of extremist Muslim converts that could be construed as a death threat. The group, through its website Revolutionmuslim.com, had reacted to last week’s episode of South Park which first depicted Muhammad dressed as a bear by saying its originators, Matt Stone and Trey Parker, “will probably wind up like Theo van Gogh”.

To underline the point, the website carried a picture of Van Gogh, the Dutch film-maker killed in 2004 after he made a documentary on the abuse of women in Muslim countries, with his throat cut and a knife in his chest. They also listed the New York headquarters of Comedy Central, the cable television channel that broadcasts the show, and South Park’s production company, adding: “You can pay them a visit at these addresses.”

In response to the controversy, cartoonist Molly Norris came up with a poster for a fictional “Everybody Draw Muhammad Day.” Needless to say, it went absolutely viral, with someone even starting a facebook group. At first, Norris seemed like she was in support of it, but the more attention she and her cartoon received, the more she backed away from it.

Norris’s attitude, and that of Comedy Central, is one of fear. Fear of what a small, but very vocal group of people might do.

Not that one can blame them. As mentioned above in the quote, filmmaker Theo van Gogh was murdered, and Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard has received numerous death threats since a cartoon he made in 2005. Not to mention Salman Rushdie and the infamous death threat given to him after his novel The Satanic Verses came out. Really, with these cases alone, the fears of Norris and Comedy Central are justified.

But that is what I find so sad about this situation. Unfortunately, the fears are justified, people have been killed, and subsequently, artists and writers and the media in general are afraid to be critical — hell, even to joke — for fear of the retaliation by a minority of extremists.

With all these stories, I was reminded of a Christopher Hitchens article I read in Vanity Fair. It’s called “Assassins of the Mind” and it’s about this very thing: self-censorship out of fear. Hitchens brings up Rushdie and everything that happened after the Ayatollah issued his fatwa, which he says was “the opening shot in a war on cultural freedom.”

We live now in a climate where every publisher and editor and politician has to weigh in advance the possibility of violent Muslim reprisal.

So there is now a hidden partner in our cultural and academic and publishing and broadcasting world: a shadowy figure that has, uninvited, drawn up a chair to the table. He never speaks. He doesn’t have to. But he is very well understood. The late playwright Simon Gray was alluding to him when he said that Nicholas Hytner, the head of London’s National Theatre, might put on a play mocking Christianity but never one that questioned Islam. I brushed up against the unacknowledged censor myself when I went on CNN to defend the Danish cartoons and found that, though the network would show the relevant page of the newspaper, it had pixelated the cartoons themselves. And this in an age when the image is everything. The lady anchor did not blush to tell me that the network was obliterating its very stock-in-trade (newsworthy pictures) out of sheer fear.

Part of the problem I think (although I really have no evidence for this) is that, comparatively speaking, Islam is a newer religion, and it just hasn’t gone through the kind of reformation that Christianity went through. Sure, there are Christian extremists just as well as Muslim, but there is a more violent undertone with the Muslim extremists, and there seems to be more believers that think the Qur’ an is literally the written word of god. It also doesn’t help that we are living in an age where information is at your fingertips, and possible offenses to Islam can be found in an instant.

And unfortunately, because of the violent reactions of some, many are going to continue to censor themselves, until more and more people — within and outside the faith — stand up against extremism.

No, you don’t need that

Speaking of advertising, we all know that it’s whole purpose is to make you want to buy something. So what if you don’t need that something? Well, effective advertising creates a need.

So what about the cognitive dissonance that erupts when you realize that these artificial needs don’t actually fill a void in your life?

This is the latest Pictures For Sad Children strip — a site I’ve just discovered, thanks to The Daily What.

Kind of reminds me of They Live (classic clip).

Clever, well-executed ad

Although I take issue with our ad-soaked society, I’m not against advertising as a concept. In theory, it can both entertain and inform. Unfortunately, too often it is shrill, annoying and repetitive, with little or no useful information.

Here’s an ad that I can support, though:

It works as a short film — let’s ignore the fact that it’s ripping off the first 10 minutes of ‘Up’ — and also as advertisement.

If John Lewis had executed this poorly, it would have come off as supremely creepy that one store could claim to take care of you for your whole life. It might have seemed totalitarian and Orwellian. Instead, by tying it in with family life, they’ve emphasized the commitment — that they are there, for you to choose.

Interestingly, Wikipedia notes that the department store’s slogan, “Never Knowingly Undersold” has been in use for 76 years.

Heck, if they can stand by a three-word phrase for that long, I actually do have some confidence that I can buy my shirts there for the rest of my days.

(via The Guardian)

The type on record covers

Why yes, I do like the cover of this Psychedelic Furs album. I just wish I knew what the typeface was that they were using on it.

Oh wait — there’s a website for that?

Yes, in case you’re not typophile enough to know at a glance what font choice your favourite rock star has picked, you can check out Rock That Font. It’s a blog that’s just getting started, but it’s one of those ones you hope will be around for a while.

Here’s what they say about “All of this and nothing,” above:

At a time when most were watching Miami Vice and sporting Hypercolor, the Psychedelic Furs’ 1988 compilation All of This and Nothing delivers a minimalist black and white composition to near perfection. No bright attention-grabbing neons or funky typefaces here. Simply Univers in all lowercase (likely Univers 49 Light Ultra Condensed with tightened tracking). The neo-grotesque sans-serif was originally designed by Adrian Frutiger in 1954 and released by the French foundry Deberny & Peignot in 1957.

As any graphic designer worth his or her salt knows, Frutiger’s numbering system was first used with Univers and adopted for use in the Frutiger, Avenir, and Neue Helvetica families. (The number used is a concatenation of two numbers: the first set defines weight and the second defines width and position.)

Ahhh, ’tis a blog that speaks to me.

Do you hate newspapers? You’re not alone

This is for all the journalists out there. One of the joys (?) of working at a newspaper is that people expect you to be perfect on a day-in, day-out basis.

It’s good to always keep on your toes, and I agree that accuracy is the foundation of any good journalism. But when readers find something in your paper that you haven’t gotten right, they’re quick to call or email and to irately take you to task for it.

This can be good — letting you know that you’ve goofed, however embarrassingly, is key if you’re going to correct it.

But this can also be bad. Sometimes readers want to get into very arcane grammatical discussions with you. Sorry, the serial comma just isn’t CP style.

And sometimes they think you’re not doing it right just because you’re not doing what they want or expect. For example, give me one good reason why a TV grid is relevant information in this day and age. But readers will piss and moan that your 75-cent paper is suddenly robbed of all value should you so much as shrink the crossword by a half-inch.

Anyway, I’ve found a website that is devoted to these cranky complaint calls and emails. In any newsroom, some of the crankiest cranks get passed around on the voice mail system, or forwarded along via email so that everyone can get a kick out of the crazy old bat who drunkenly berates you for canceling Marmaduke but then, after three minutes of vitriol, manages to find it on the page, and yet still signs off with an accusatory tone, because it should somehow have been easier to find it.

Yes, we’ve all got those tales, and Paper Haters is the place to send them, so that newsrooms around the world can share. Sometimes, it’s a chance for reporters to vent with people who just aren’t happy with the coverage of something, but there are some gems. Try this email:

I just wanted to let you know, that your story and pictures on WRESTLER, state champ from TEAM X High School, were perfect … Athough this was great, the other local wrestling coverage stunk.

Or this one:

Miss REPORTER, you are a Socialist Liberal Democrat scumbag and when the journalism business goes through another wave of lay-offs, I hope you’re at the top of the axing list. Journalists like you are what’s wrong with this country.

But the best are always the voice mails. I love this guy:

Part one: What about the Kentucky Derby 1

Part two: What about the Kentucky Derby 2

Or, see if you can gear up your brain to make full sense of this woman.

Folk Fest camping tickets are sold out

And Hitler is pissed.

This video is just one of many parodies using the German movie “Downfall.” Rocketboom has your full rundown of the meme here. Just recently, the production company behind the film has been trying to get the videos removed from Youtube, which spawned a version of the meme where Hitler shouts “nein!” for 10 minutes.

Do you miss Geocities?

It doesn’t seem all that long ago that Geocities was the place to go if you wanted a presence on the web. Creating websites from scratch was a horrifyingly daunting prospect and there were none of the Web 2.0 social media sites that all the kids are talking about these days. (Okay, perhaps it’s not just kids — in fact, an estimated 42% of Canadians have a Facebook account).

But Geocities…man. You could customize it by making the background all sorts of sweet colours, add some tinny musics, some animated gifs…there was no end to the things a creative individual could do in creating their own personal presence online.

Sadly, Geocities was shut down last year. To my mind, it was the Internet equivalent of the burning of the Library of Alexandria. Entire communities of information and knowledge and sparkly, flashing fonts disappeared overnight. Tragic.

For those of use that miss those days, if even for brief moments of nostalgia, there is an answer: The Geocities-izer. Simply enter the URL of any website into the text box and the Geocities-izer will reconfigure the website to appear as it may have been seen on Geocities.

Welcome back to 1999.

Absurd Intellectual, had it been established ten years earlier. Stylish, no?

3D filmmaking gone too far?

In a story fit for Weekend Update, Paramount has announced that it will be going ahead with a third installment of “The Ring.”

In 3D.

Really, Paramount? You feel the need to make an unnecessary sequel to a decent film. In 3D. Really.

Ever since “Avatar” came out (and made a shit-load of money) studios seem to be scrambling to render every film they can into 3D, regardless of whether or not it actually looks good.

I recently saw “Alice in Wonderland” and the 3D felt like a lazy addition; it was kind of cool in places, but I would have enjoyed the movie just as much if it was in 2D. Considering that’s what it was shot in.

“The Ring” was actually a good movie. It was the kind of horror film I enjoy, full of atmosphere, tension, and the occasional moment that makes you jump. Making a third movie (which is itself annoying. Get over sequels, studios! Get over it!) in 3D is probably going to amount to cheap thrills with the creepy girl reaching out for you in your seat.

I know 3D has been around for awhile, but because of the success of “Avatar” it’s already becoming tiresome with how many films are eagerly pitched as “IN 3D, ZOMG!!”

UPDATE! Roger Ebert feels the SAME WAY!

How to know if country music is right for you

Take this quick 15-question quiz!

Based on my answers, I should “give country radio a shot. Some of it will bother you, but you could be surprised how gratifyingly clever, sing-a-long-able, engagingly told and frankly touching a lot of it is”

And that is why I listen to folk. Go to hell, twang.

(via Coudal)

Vintage photo of post-quake San Fran

Apparently this is a world-famous photograph, taken by George R. Lawrence, but I’ve never before seen it. It’s a panorama of San Francisco, taken from a balloon or kite, about six weeks after the devastating earthquake of 1906.

Click on it to see the enormous full-size resolution — it’s 7,000 pixels wide.

And even that doesn’t compare to the original scan, which is a 158 MB tiff hosted at the Library of Congress. With that, you could print a four-foot-long poster that was the same resolution as a regular snapshot.

I’ve now got it set as my desktop background, and even though I’ve got a dual-monitor setup, with two 1920 x 1200 Apple cinema displays, I still had to downsize and crop this image. It’s wow.

Check out the photographer’s Wikipedia entry for more about how the photo was taken — and also how he built what was then the world’s largest camera (it’s a monster).

On the Minneapolis Star Tribune’s website, there’s a tale about him being hired to take aerial shots of that city. It didn’t work out quite so well.

(from Retronaut)

Older posts «